Evaluation Report

Evaluation Report

Reviewer Name: ………………………………………….
Degree: ………………………………………………………
University: ………………………………………………….
Article Title: ………………………………………………..

  • Appropriateness of article title to you domains of interests

     High
     Medium
     Low

  • Article content:

    Predominance of theoretical part
     Predominance of empirical part
     Balance between theoreticaland empiricalparts

  • Method scientificity:

    Excellent
     Good
     Medium
     Weak

  • Do you feel that the content has been already published?

    Yes
     No

    If yes, please provide the source:

    ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

  • Language level:

     Excellent
     Bon
     acceptable
     Weak
     Very weak

  • Results importance evaluation:

     Results With important applications
     Results With worthy of importance applications
     Results with medium importance
     Weak results without evidently aplications
     Results could be enriched

  • References and previous studies:
    Good
     Medium
     Weak

  • Overall article evaluation:
    Excellent
     Good
     Medium
     Weak

  • Final decision :
    The article is not appropriate for publication
     Appropriate for publication with major modification without modifications
     Appropriate for publication with minor modification
     Appropriate for publication without modification

  • Final decision :

     The article is not appropriate for publication
     Appropriate for publication with major modification
     Appropriate for publication with minor modification
     Appropriate for publication without

  • Remarks for author(s) :